Traditional, Cooperative, Constructivist, and Computer-Assisted Mathematics Teaching: A Meta-Analytic Comparison Regarding Student Success

Artigo2021

0 visualizações desta ficha 0 acessos ao texto completo Contagem real do Portal desde 25/09/2026; tráfego comum, sem testes; quem desativa o rastreamento no navegador não é contado.

Resumo

The purpose of this research was to perform a meta-analysis to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of traditional, cooperative, constructivist, and computer-assisted teaching, and also to compare the effectiveness of these four approaches over the last twenty years. So, the present research adopted meta-analysis technique. In order to identify relevant empirical studies on the effect of cooperative, constructivist, and computer-assisted teaching on student success, a systematic literature view was carried out over three-month's time, using several databases. Based on this extensive review, the studies (N = 34) evaluating the effect of cooperative, constructivist, and computer-assisted teaching on student success in mathematics were included in the research. In the research, the procedure effectiveness technique was adopted for the analyses of the data obtained from the empirical studies involved in the meta-analysis. The results of the research indicated that cooperative, constructivist, and computer-assisted mathematics teaching were more effective in the improvement of academic success of students, rather than the traditional one, indicating that all these three approaches of teaching were effective than the traditional one to improve the student success in mathematics course. Thus, it may be suggested that student-centered teaching should be used in mathematics, rather than the traditional one.

Dados da obra

Tipo: Artigo
Periódico: International Journal of Technology in Education
Ano: 2021
Idioma: en
Palavras-chave: Conventional Instruction; Cooperative Learning; Constructivism (Learning); Computer Assisted Instruction; Instructional Effectiveness; Elementary Secondary Education; Higher Education; Educational Research; Effect Size; Mathematics Instruction; Mathematics Achievement; Student Centered Learning; Foreign Countries
ISSN: EISSN-2689-2758
Acesso: Download disponível
Fontes: ERIC — Education Resources Information Center
Na Biblioteca desde: 01/10/2026 · verificada em 03/10/2026

Como citar

ABNT
BAS, Gokhan; KIVILCIM, Zafer S.. Traditional, Cooperative, Constructivist, and Computer-Assisted Mathematics Teaching: A Meta-Analytic Comparison Regarding Student Success. International Journal of Technology in Education, 2021. Disponível em: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1311520. Acesso em: 5 nov. 2026.

APA

Bas, G., & Kivilcim, Z. S. (2021). Traditional, Cooperative, Constructivist, and Computer-Assisted Mathematics Teaching: A Meta-Analytic Comparison Regarding Student Success. International Journal of Technology in Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1311520

BibTeX

@article{bas2021,
  author = {Bas, Gokhan and Kivilcim, Zafer S.},
  title = {Traditional, Cooperative, Constructivist, and Computer-Assisted Mathematics Teaching: A Meta-Analytic Comparison Regarding Student Success},
  year = {2021},
  journal = {International Journal of Technology in Education},
  url = {https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1311520},
  language = {en}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bas, Gokhan
AU  - Kivilcim, Zafer S.
TI  - Traditional, Cooperative, Constructivist, and Computer-Assisted Mathematics Teaching: A Meta-Analytic Comparison Regarding Student Success
PY  - 2021
JO  - International Journal of Technology in Education
UR  - https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1311520
LA  - en
ER  -

Referência gerada automaticamente a partir dos metadados das fontes; confira com o documento original. Baixar BibTeX · Baixar RIS