Atomic, reusable feedback: a semi-automated solution for assessing handwritten tasks? A crossover experiment with mathematics teachers.

Artigo2022

Filip Moons ORCID; Ellen Vandervieren ORCID; Jozef Colpaert ORCID

0 visualizações desta ficha 0 acessos ao texto completo Contagem real do Portal desde 25/09/2026; tráfego comum, sem testes; quem desativa o rastreamento no navegador não é contado.

Na última verificação automática (02/10/2026), não respondeu na fonte: PDF (HTTP 403). O endereço é mantido e volta a ser verificado no próximo ciclo; se o link não abrir, tente mais tarde ou use a página oficial.

Resumo

Feedback has been recognized as a crucial element in the learning and teaching process. Although teachers know and accept this, they are not always eager to engage in this tedious and time-consuming activity. This study investigates how computers can work together with teachers to make the process of giving feedback more efficient by introducing a semi-automated approach (SA) with reusable feedback: when a teacher writes feedback for a student, the computer saves it, so it can be reused when following students make similar mistakes. We devised the concept of atomic feedback, a set of form requirements that could enhance feedback's reusability. To write atomic feedback, teachers have to identify the independent errors and write brief feedback items for each separate error. Our SA approach with reusable feedback was implemented in Moodle. During a crossover experiment with math teachers (n = 36 + 9 in pilot study), we examined (1) whether SA saves time or changes the amount of feedback, as compared to traditional, paper-based correction work, (2) the extent to which the feedback was atomic, (3) whether atomic feedback enhances the reusability of feedback and (4) how teachers used and perceived the SA system. In light of the results, which suggest that atomic feedback is indeed reusable, we propose formal requirements for writing reusable feedback. Nevertheless, teachers did not save time using the SA system, but they provided significantly more feedback.

Dados da obra

Tipo: Artigo
Periódico: Computers and Education Open, v. 3, p. 100086
Editora: Elsevier BV
Ano: 2022 (2022-04-26)
Idioma: en
Palavras-chave: teacher feedback; mathematics teachers; Moodle; independent errors; teacher perceptions; computer-assisted feedback
DOI: 10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100086
ISSN: 2666-5573
Licença: cc-by
Acesso: Acesso aberto
Fontes: OpenAlex
Na Biblioteca desde: 01/10/2026 · verificada em 03/10/2026

Como citar

ABNT
MOONS, Filip; VANDERVIEREN, Ellen; COLPAERT, Jozef. Atomic, reusable feedback: a semi-automated solution for assessing handwritten tasks? A crossover experiment with mathematics teachers.. Computers and Education Open, v. 3, p. 100086, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100086.

APA

Moons, F., Vandervieren, E., & Colpaert, J. (2022). Atomic, reusable feedback: a semi-automated solution for assessing handwritten tasks? A crossover experiment with mathematics teachers.. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100086

BibTeX

@article{moons2022,
  author = {Moons, Filip and Vandervieren, Ellen and Colpaert, Jozef},
  title = {Atomic, reusable feedback: a semi-automated solution for assessing handwritten tasks? A crossover experiment with mathematics teachers.},
  year = {2022},
  journal = {Computers and Education Open},
  volume = {3},
  pages = {100086},
  publisher = {Elsevier BV},
  doi = {10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100086},
  language = {en}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Moons, Filip
AU  - Vandervieren, Ellen
AU  - Colpaert, Jozef
TI  - Atomic, reusable feedback: a semi-automated solution for assessing handwritten tasks? A crossover experiment with mathematics teachers.
PY  - 2022
JO  - Computers and Education Open
VL  - 3
SP  - 100086
DO  - 10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100086
LA  - en
ER  -

Referência gerada automaticamente a partir dos metadados das fontes; confira com o documento original. Baixar BibTeX · Baixar RIS