How preservice teachers evaluated the accuracy of ChatGPT-generated solutions of curriculum-based mathematical word problems in a self-directed context

Artigo2026

Sfiso Cebolenkosi Mahlaba

0 visualizações desta ficha 0 acessos ao texto completo Contagem real do Portal desde 25/09/2026; tráfego comum, sem testes; quem desativa o rastreamento no navegador não é contado.

Resumo

IntroductionThe increasing availability of ChatGPT and its capacity to generate solutions to mathematical problems has raised important questions for mathematics education, particularly regarding how preservice teachers engage in evaluating ChatGPT-generated mathematical solutions. Although prior research has examined the pedagogical use of generative AI in mathematics teaching and learning, less is known about how preservice mathematics teachers engage with evaluating the accuracy of AI-generated solutions to contextualised mathematical word problems under self-directed and unstandardised prompting.MethodsGrounded in metacognition as a theoretical lens, this study adopts an exploratory, naturalistic design to examine how preservice teachers engaged with and evaluated ChatGPT-generated mathematical solutions. The study was conducted within a third-year mathematics methodology module in which AI tools were integrated into teaching, learning, and assessment. A qualitative document analysis was used to analyse 30 preservice teachers' written assignments, focusing on their evaluations of AI-generated solutions produced through individually constructed prompts in an uncontrolled interaction environment.ResultsThe findings indicated that participants' evaluations were predominantly informed by metacognitive knowledge, particularly prior mathematical content knowledge, rather than metacognitive experiences involving real-time monitoring and regulation, which may be attributed to the task design of the problems involved in the study. However, variability in the AI-generated outputs, resulting from non-standardised prompting practices, meant that participants did not evaluate identical solutions, which constrains direct comparability across cases. Within these authentic engagement conditions, participants also tended to show higher levels of trust in ChatGPT-generated solutions when they were unable to independently solve the problems to correct the ChatGPT-generated solutions. Additional findings revealed evidence of both effective and ineffective application and regulation of metacognitive knowledge: some PSTs successfully applied conditional, declarative, and procedural knowledge to reject incorrect ChatGPT-generated solutions and justify accurate corrections, while others demonstrated weak regulation, superficial claims, or confirmation bias that led to perpetuated errors. Similarly, metacognitive experiences varied, with some students engaging in active monitoring and self-correction, while others failed to critically evaluate their own reasoning.DiscussionThis study contributes to research on the integration of generative AI in mathematics teacher education by offering exploratory insights into preservice teachers' metacognitive engagement with AI-generated mathematical solutions under naturalistic conditions. It highlights not only the need to develop evaluative and metacognitive competencies for AI-mediated environments but also the importance of strengthening both the application and regulation of metacognitive knowledge and experiences. In doing so, the study emphasises the methodological importance of distinguishing between controlled and self-directed AI interaction designs and contributes to understanding how metacognitive processes shape preservice teachers' ability to critically engage with AI-generated mathematical solutions.

Dados da obra

Tipo
Artigo
Periódico
Frontiers in Education, v. 11
Editora
Frontiers Media S.A.
Ano
2026 (2026-08)
Idioma
en
Palavras-chave
artificial intelligence; ChatGPT-generated feedback; mathematical problem-solving; mathematics education; preservice teachers
Temas
Avaliação, Currículo, Formação de Professores de Matemática, Resolução de Problemas
DOI
10.3389/feduc.2026.1783496
ISSN
2504-284X
Acesso
Acesso aberto
Fontes
DOAJ — Directory of Open Access Journals
Na Biblioteca desde
01/10/2026 · verificada em 03/10/2026

Como citar

ABNT
MAHLABA, Sfiso Cebolenkosi. How preservice teachers evaluated the accuracy of ChatGPT-generated solutions of curriculum-based mathematical word problems in a self-directed context. Frontiers in Education, v. 11, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1783496.

APA

Mahlaba, S. C. (2026). How preservice teachers evaluated the accuracy of ChatGPT-generated solutions of curriculum-based mathematical word problems in a self-directed context. Frontiers in Education, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1783496

BibTeX
@article{mahlaba2026,
  author = {Mahlaba, Sfiso Cebolenkosi},
  title = {How preservice teachers evaluated the accuracy of ChatGPT-generated solutions of curriculum-based mathematical word problems in a self-directed context},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Frontiers in Education},
  volume = {11},
  publisher = {Frontiers Media S.A.},
  doi = {10.3389/feduc.2026.1783496},
  language = {en}
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mahlaba, Sfiso Cebolenkosi
TI  - How preservice teachers evaluated the accuracy of ChatGPT-generated solutions of curriculum-based mathematical word problems in a self-directed context
PY  - 2026
JO  - Frontiers in Education
VL  - 11
DO  - 10.3389/feduc.2026.1783496
LA  - en
ER  - 

Referência gerada automaticamente a partir dos metadados das fontes; confira com o documento original. Baixar BibTeX · Baixar RIS

Obras relacionadas

Obras do acervo corrente com mais temas em comum.

Acessibilidade

As escolhas valem em todas as páginas internas e ficam só neste navegador. Atalho: tecla de acesso 5.

Perfis rápidos

Ajustes

Sobre a acessibilidade do Portal