Epistemic Obstacles in Real Analysis: Newman’s Error Analysis of Prospective Mathematics Teachers' Theorem Proving

Artigo2026

Ahmad Syamsuadi; Nasrun Nasrun; Baharullah Baharullah; Mukhlis Mukhlis; Andi Kaharuddin; Joseph Ozigis Akomodi

0 visualizações desta ficha 0 acessos ao texto completo Contagem real do Portal desde 25/09/2026; tráfego comum, sem testes; quem desativa o rastreamento no navegador não é contado.

Resumo

Real Analysis is often a gatekeeper course in mathematics education, marking the difficult transition from computational calculus to formal axiomatic proof. Prospective mathematics teachers frequently struggle to construct rigorous proofs, even for fundamental properties. This study employs Newman's Error Analysis (NEA) to analyze the epistemological obstacles underlying these struggles. This descriptive qualitative case study involved 15 fifth-semester undergraduates at Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar who completed a diagnostic proof test on field properties. Analysis of student work revealed that none made errors at the 'Reading' stage. Instead, errors clustered at higher cognitive stages: 3 students exhibited Comprehension errors, 5 made Transformation errors, 4 showed Process Skills errors, and 3 made Encoding errors. From this cohort, four subjects, each exemplifying one of these non-reading error types, were selected for in-depth semi-structured interviews. The findings indicate a hierarchical breakdown in proof construction specifically for the theorem: "If a ≠ 0 and a ∈ ℝ, prove that ≠ 0." Students either failed to translate verbal understanding into explicit premises (Comprehension), could not operationalize an indirect proof strategy (Transformation), neglected to justify algebraic steps with axioms (Process Skills), or omitted formal concluding statements (Encoding). The study concludes that errors often perceived as "carelessness" can be symptoms of deeper epistemological obstacles, such as viewing proof as a computational ritual rather than a formal, communicative argument. These findings underscore the need for explicit instruction on proof mechanics and structure, even when students possess correct mathematical intuition.

Dados da obra

Tipo
Artigo
Periódico
Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram, v. 14, n. 2
Editora
Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika (UNDIKMA)
Ano
2026
Idioma
en
Palavras-chave
Error Analysis; Mathematics Education; Newman’s Procedure; Real Analysis; Theorem Proving
Temas
Álgebra, Cálculo
DOI
10.33394/j-ps.v14i2.19323
ISSN
2338-4530, 2540-7899
Acesso
Acesso aberto
Fontes
DOAJ — Directory of Open Access Journals
Na Biblioteca desde
01/10/2026 · verificada em 03/10/2026

Como citar

ABNT
SYAMSUADI, Ahmad et al.. Epistemic Obstacles in Real Analysis: Newman’s Error Analysis of Prospective Mathematics Teachers' Theorem Proving. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram, v. 14, n. 2, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v14i2.19323.

APA

Syamsuadi, A., Nasrun, N., Baharullah, B., Mukhlis, M., Kaharuddin, A., & Akomodi, J. O. (2026). Epistemic Obstacles in Real Analysis: Newman’s Error Analysis of Prospective Mathematics Teachers' Theorem Proving. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v14i2.19323

BibTeX
@article{syamsuadi2026,
  author = {Syamsuadi, Ahmad and Nasrun, Nasrun and Baharullah, Baharullah and Mukhlis, Mukhlis and Kaharuddin, Andi and Akomodi, Joseph Ozigis},
  title = {Epistemic Obstacles in Real Analysis: Newman’s Error Analysis of Prospective Mathematics Teachers' Theorem Proving},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram},
  volume = {14},
  number = {2},
  publisher = {Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika (UNDIKMA)},
  doi = {10.33394/j-ps.v14i2.19323},
  language = {en}
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Syamsuadi, Ahmad
AU  - Nasrun, Nasrun
AU  - Baharullah, Baharullah
AU  - Mukhlis, Mukhlis
AU  - Kaharuddin, Andi
AU  - Akomodi, Joseph Ozigis
TI  - Epistemic Obstacles in Real Analysis: Newman’s Error Analysis of Prospective Mathematics Teachers' Theorem Proving
PY  - 2026
JO  - Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram
VL  - 14
IS  - 2
DO  - 10.33394/j-ps.v14i2.19323
LA  - en
ER  - 

Referência gerada automaticamente a partir dos metadados das fontes; confira com o documento original. Baixar BibTeX · Baixar RIS

Obras relacionadas

Obras do acervo corrente com mais temas em comum.

Acessibilidade

As escolhas valem em todas as páginas internas e ficam só neste navegador. Atalho: tecla de acesso 5.

Perfis rápidos

Ajustes

Sobre a acessibilidade do Portal