Mathematics teachers’ AI literacy, anxiety, and perceptions of AI integration in mathematics education: a mixed-methods study
0 visualizações desta ficha 0 acessos ao texto completo Contagem real do Portal desde 25/09/2026; tráfego comum, sem testes; quem desativa o rastreamento no navegador não é contado.
Resumo
Abstract Background The rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are fundamentally transforming mathematics teaching processes and offering new pedagogical opportunities within instructional environments. However, the effective use of these technologies is closely related to mathematics teachers’ levels of knowledge, awareness, attitudes, and skills regarding AI. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between mathematics teachers’ AI literacy and AI anxiety, to conduct an in-depth analysis of their perceptions regarding the integration of AI into mathematics education, and to evaluate the effects of variables such as watching AI-related films, technology use, and age on this process. Methods This study employed a mixed-methods design. In the quantitative phase, a predictive correlational model was employed, while in the qualitative phase, a case study approach was utilized. Data were collected from 251 mathematics teachers working in various regions of Türkiye. The quantitative data were analyzed using a range of statistical analysis techniques, whereas the qualitative data were evaluated through content analysis. Results The findings indicate that mathematics teachers’ levels of AI literacy are above average, whereas their levels of AI anxiety are below average. A significant and negative relationship was found between AI literacy and AI anxiety. Furthermore, the level of technology use in mathematics instruction was identified as the strongest predictor of both AI literacy and AI anxiety. The results also revealed that mathematics teachers’ most prominent anxiety is that the excessive use of AI tools may weaken students’ independent thinking and problem-solving skills. In addition, anxiety regarding the potential weakening of the teaching role and the possibility that AI could replace teachers were also noteworthy. Conclusions Professional development programs should encompass not only the fundamental technological features of AI but also its pedagogical contributions to mathematics instruction. Mathematics teachers should be provided with opportunities to observe how AI supports key instructional processes such as differentiated instruction, formative assessment, and conceptual visualization. Furthermore, training modules should aim to develop teachers’ abilities to critically evaluate AI-generated mathematical content in terms of accuracy and pedagogical appropriateness. Through such targeted training, teachers can enhance their AI literacy and create safe and pedagogically meaningful digital learning environments for their students.
Dados da obra
- Tipo
- Artigo
- Periódico
- BMC Psychology, v. 14, n. 1, p. 1-19
- Editora
- BMC
- Ano
- 2025 (2025-12)
- Idioma
- en
- Palavras-chave
- Artificial intelligence; Mathematics teacher; Literacy; Anxiety; AI literacy; AI anxiety; mathematics teachers; teacher perceptions; teacher professional development; AI replacing teachers; critical evaluation of AI-generated content
- Temas
- Avaliação, Formação de Professores de Matemática, Resolução de Problemas
- DOI
- 10.1186/s40359-025-03836-0
- ISSN
- 2050-7283
- Licença
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Acesso
- Acesso aberto
- Fontes
- DOAJ — Directory of Open Access Journals; OpenAlex
- Na Biblioteca desde
- 01/10/2026 · verificada em 03/10/2026
Como citar
ABNT
KUZU, Çiğdem İnci. Mathematics teachers’ AI literacy, anxiety, and perceptions of AI integration in mathematics education: a mixed-methods study. BMC Psychology, v. 14, n. 1, p. 1-19, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03836-0.
APA
Kuzu, Ç. İ. (2025). Mathematics teachers’ AI literacy, anxiety, and perceptions of AI integration in mathematics education: a mixed-methods study. BMC Psychology, 14(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03836-0
BibTeX
@article{kuzu2025,
author = {Kuzu, Çiğdem İnci},
title = {Mathematics teachers’ AI literacy, anxiety, and perceptions of AI integration in mathematics education: a mixed-methods study},
year = {2025},
journal = {BMC Psychology},
volume = {14},
number = {1},
pages = {1-19},
publisher = {BMC},
doi = {10.1186/s40359-025-03836-0},
language = {en}
}RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Kuzu, Çiğdem İnci TI - Mathematics teachers’ AI literacy, anxiety, and perceptions of AI integration in mathematics education: a mixed-methods study PY - 2025 JO - BMC Psychology VL - 14 IS - 1 SP - 1 EP - 19 DO - 10.1186/s40359-025-03836-0 LA - en ER -
Referência gerada automaticamente a partir dos metadados das fontes; confira com o documento original. Baixar BibTeX · Baixar RIS
Obras relacionadas
Obras do acervo corrente com mais temas em comum.
-
The problem posing capacities of pre-service post-primary mathematics teachers: insights from an Irish university
Frontiers in Education, v. 11 · DOI 10.3389/feduc.2026.1851481
-
Exploração, Proposição e Resolução de Problemas no Ensino de Matemática:
Perspectivas da Educação Matemática, v. 19, n. 53 · DOI 10.46312/fr5pze40
Em verificação -
Planejamento de Aula e as Categorias do Conhecimento Didático-Matemático dos Professores dos Anos Iniciais do Ensino Fundamental
PARADIGMA · DOI 10.37618/paradigma.1011-2251.2026.e2026006.id1752
Download disponível Baixar PDF na fonte: Planejamento de Aula e as Categorias do Conhecimento Didático-Matemático dos Professores dos Anos Iniciais do Ensino Fundamental (abre em nova aba) Acessar texto completo: Planejamento de Aula e as Categorias do Conhecimento Didático-Matemático dos Professores dos Anos Iniciais do Ensino Fundamental (abre em nova aba) -
Unlocking Mathematics Teaching Through Problem-Solving: A Study of Teachers’ Perspectives
European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, v. 4, n. 4 · DOI 10.59324/ejtas.2026.4(4).05
-
Danish preservice teachers’ solving of linear equations: A challenge for teacher education
Nordic Journal of STEM Education, v. 10, n. 1 · DOI 10.5324/njsteme.v10i1.6447