How to Assess Mathematics Teachers’ TPACK? A Comparison Between Self-Reports and Knowledge Tests

Artigo2024

Alina Kadluba ORCID; Andreas Obersteiner ORCID

0 visualizações desta ficha 0 acessos ao texto completo Contagem real do Portal desde 25/09/2026; tráfego comum, sem testes; quem desativa o rastreamento no navegador não é contado.

Resumo

Abstract Teachers need technology-related knowledge to effectively use technology in the classroom. Previous studies have often used self-reports to assess such knowledge. However, it is questionable whether self-reports are valid measures for this purpose. This study investigates how mathematics teachers’ self-reports correlate with their scores in a paper–pencil knowledge test regarding TPCK (technological pedagogical content knowledge), CK (content knowledge), pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), and technological knowledge (TK). Participants were $$N = 173$$ N = 173 pre- and in-service mathematics teachers. To assess self-reports, we adapted an existing survey from the literature. We also compiled a knowledge test based on items from existing test instruments. To increase comparability between the two instruments, both the self-report and the paper–pencil knowledge test addressed the specific topic of fractions. The four subscales in both instruments had sufficient reliability. The correlations between the self-reports and the paper–pencil test scores were low or very low for all subscales $$\left(r=.00-.23\right)$$ r = . 00 - . 23 , suggesting that the two instruments captured different underlying constructs. While paper–pencil tests seem more suitable for assessing knowledge, self-reports may be influenced more strongly by participants’ personal traits such as self-efficacy. Our findings raise concerns about the validity of self-reports as measures of teachers’ professional knowledge, and the comparability of studies that use distinct assessment instruments. We recommend that researchers should be more cautious when interpreting self-reports as knowledge and rely more strongly on externally assessed tests.

Dados da obra

Tipo
Artigo
Periódico
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, v. 23, n. 3, p. 663-688
Editora
Springer Nature
Ano
2024 (2024-08-06)
Idioma
en
Palavras-chave
TPACK; technological pedagogical content knowledge; mathematics teachers; self-report validity; pedagogical content knowledge; content knowledge; technological knowledge; self-efficacy; fractions; pre-service and in-service teachers
Temas
Avaliação
DOI
10.1007/s10763-024-10490-2
ISSN
1571-0068, 1573-1774
Licença
cc-by
Acesso
Acesso aberto
Fontes
OpenAlex
Na Biblioteca desde
01/10/2026 · verificada em 03/10/2026

Como citar

ABNT
KADLUBA, Alina; OBERSTEINER, Andreas. How to Assess Mathematics Teachers’ TPACK? A Comparison Between Self-Reports and Knowledge Tests. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, v. 23, n. 3, p. 663-688, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10490-2.

APA

Kadluba, A., & Obersteiner, A. (2024). How to Assess Mathematics Teachers’ TPACK? A Comparison Between Self-Reports and Knowledge Tests. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23(3), 663-688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10490-2

BibTeX
@article{kadluba2024,
  author = {Kadluba, Alina and Obersteiner, Andreas},
  title = {How to Assess Mathematics Teachers’ TPACK? A Comparison Between Self-Reports and Knowledge Tests},
  year = {2024},
  journal = {International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education},
  volume = {23},
  number = {3},
  pages = {663-688},
  publisher = {Springer Nature},
  doi = {10.1007/s10763-024-10490-2},
  language = {en}
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kadluba, Alina
AU  - Obersteiner, Andreas
TI  - How to Assess Mathematics Teachers’ TPACK? A Comparison Between Self-Reports and Knowledge Tests
PY  - 2024
JO  - International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
VL  - 23
IS  - 3
SP  - 663
EP  - 688
DO  - 10.1007/s10763-024-10490-2
LA  - en
ER  - 

Referência gerada automaticamente a partir dos metadados das fontes; confira com o documento original. Baixar BibTeX · Baixar RIS

Obras relacionadas

Obras do acervo corrente com mais temas em comum.

Acessibilidade

As escolhas valem em todas as páginas internas e ficam só neste navegador. Atalho: tecla de acesso 5.

Perfis rápidos

Ajustes

Sobre a acessibilidade do Portal