How to Assess Mathematics Teachers’ TPACK? A Comparison Between Self-Reports and Knowledge Tests
0 visualizações desta ficha 0 acessos ao texto completo Contagem real do Portal desde 25/09/2026; tráfego comum, sem testes; quem desativa o rastreamento no navegador não é contado.
Resumo
Abstract Teachers need technology-related knowledge to effectively use technology in the classroom. Previous studies have often used self-reports to assess such knowledge. However, it is questionable whether self-reports are valid measures for this purpose. This study investigates how mathematics teachers’ self-reports correlate with their scores in a paper–pencil knowledge test regarding TPCK (technological pedagogical content knowledge), CK (content knowledge), pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), and technological knowledge (TK). Participants were $$N = 173$$ N = 173 pre- and in-service mathematics teachers. To assess self-reports, we adapted an existing survey from the literature. We also compiled a knowledge test based on items from existing test instruments. To increase comparability between the two instruments, both the self-report and the paper–pencil knowledge test addressed the specific topic of fractions. The four subscales in both instruments had sufficient reliability. The correlations between the self-reports and the paper–pencil test scores were low or very low for all subscales $$\left(r=.00-.23\right)$$ r = . 00 - . 23 , suggesting that the two instruments captured different underlying constructs. While paper–pencil tests seem more suitable for assessing knowledge, self-reports may be influenced more strongly by participants’ personal traits such as self-efficacy. Our findings raise concerns about the validity of self-reports as measures of teachers’ professional knowledge, and the comparability of studies that use distinct assessment instruments. We recommend that researchers should be more cautious when interpreting self-reports as knowledge and rely more strongly on externally assessed tests.
Dados da obra
- Tipo
- Artigo
- Periódico
- International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, v. 23, n. 3, p. 663-688
- Editora
- Springer Nature
- Ano
- 2024 (2024-08-06)
- Idioma
- en
- Palavras-chave
- TPACK; technological pedagogical content knowledge; mathematics teachers; self-report validity; pedagogical content knowledge; content knowledge; technological knowledge; self-efficacy; fractions; pre-service and in-service teachers
- Temas
- Avaliação
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10763-024-10490-2
- ISSN
- 1571-0068, 1573-1774
- Licença
- cc-by
- Acesso
- Acesso aberto
- Fontes
- OpenAlex
- Na Biblioteca desde
- 01/10/2026 · verificada em 03/10/2026
Como citar
ABNT
KADLUBA, Alina; OBERSTEINER, Andreas. How to Assess Mathematics Teachers’ TPACK? A Comparison Between Self-Reports and Knowledge Tests. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, v. 23, n. 3, p. 663-688, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10490-2.
APA
Kadluba, A., & Obersteiner, A. (2024). How to Assess Mathematics Teachers’ TPACK? A Comparison Between Self-Reports and Knowledge Tests. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23(3), 663-688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10490-2
BibTeX
@article{kadluba2024,
author = {Kadluba, Alina and Obersteiner, Andreas},
title = {How to Assess Mathematics Teachers’ TPACK? A Comparison Between Self-Reports and Knowledge Tests},
year = {2024},
journal = {International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education},
volume = {23},
number = {3},
pages = {663-688},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
doi = {10.1007/s10763-024-10490-2},
language = {en}
}RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Kadluba, Alina AU - Obersteiner, Andreas TI - How to Assess Mathematics Teachers’ TPACK? A Comparison Between Self-Reports and Knowledge Tests PY - 2024 JO - International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education VL - 23 IS - 3 SP - 663 EP - 688 DO - 10.1007/s10763-024-10490-2 LA - en ER -
Referência gerada automaticamente a partir dos metadados das fontes; confira com o documento original. Baixar BibTeX · Baixar RIS
Obras relacionadas
Obras do acervo corrente com mais temas em comum.
-
The problem posing capacities of pre-service post-primary mathematics teachers: insights from an Irish university
Frontiers in Education, v. 11 · DOI 10.3389/feduc.2026.1851481
-
MEDIACIÓN PEDAGÓGICA DE LAS TIC COMO ARGUMENTO PARA LA ENSEÑANZA DE LA MATEMÁTICA EN COLOMBIA
LÍNEA IMAGINARIA, v. 23, n. 2 · DOI 10.56219/lneaimaginaria.v23i2.5133
-
ENSEÑANZA DE LA MATEMÁTICA EN CONTEXTOS RURALES: UNA REVISIÓN DOCUMENTAL SOBRE INCLUSIÓN Y SABERES LOCALES
Dialéctica, v. 2, n. 31 · DOI 10.56219/dialctica.v2i31.6388
-
Trabalhando com projetos em contexto de Educação Matemática Crítica e Etnomatemática: explorando as tranças Nagô e conteúdos do Ensino Médio
Revista Eletrônica de Educação Matemática, v. 21 · DOI 10.5007/1981-1322.2026.e104316
Download disponível Baixar PDF na fonte: Trabalhando com projetos em contexto de Educação Matemática Crítica e Etnomatemática: explorando as tranças Nagô e conteúdos do Ensino Médio (abre em nova aba) Acessar texto completo: Trabalhando com projetos em contexto de Educação Matemática Crítica e Etnomatemática: explorando as tranças Nagô e conteúdos do Ensino Médio (abre em nova aba) -
Integrating Ethnomathematics and GeoGebra: A Project-Based Learning Approach to Improve Mathematical Literacy
Mathematics Teaching Research Journal